One of my claims to fame (he says, as if
there were several) is that I earned an acknowledgement in Ian Rankin’s dagger
prize winning novel Black and Blue.
Members of the UK ’s
Crime Writers’ Association are asked to list any areas of ‘special expertise’
so that fellow members can contact them if they need information on different
topics. I’ve written countless videos and DVDs about offshore safety as well as actual safety
induction programmes, so that was one of my ‘specialisations’. In Black and Blue, Rebus had to make a trip
to an offshore platform and Ian wrote to ask what sort of thing that involved
for a ‘visitor’. I wrote back and thereby got myself a mention.
So, apart from name-dropping, why am I
writing this? Because, on the 15th of next month, Unsafe Acts, the 5th novel in
my Jack Carston series, will be published and, as the cover image and the title
suggest, it involves an offshore platform and safety. It also involves some
reflections on homophobia and how, even in the 21st century, that’s
still a problem.
It’s been through several drafts and, as I
was reading the proofs, I again got the strange feeling that, while I knew I’d
written it and my name’s on the cover, it was hard to remember how it happened.
When something’s out there as a self-contained thing – whether in tangible form
as a paperback or in the same completeness as an ebook – it somehow seems
instantaneous. The book has become a fact. When you’re writing, you’re always poised on the edge of
wondering what the characters are going to do, where they’re going to go. The
process is one of ‘becoming’ rather than ‘being’. So for me the writer, Unsafe Acts was a succession of instants
which eventually stopped. But for me the reader, it’s a complete, set thing
with its own internal logic and a journey which has only one path. I suppose
for readers coming fresh to it, the uncertainties are still there because they
don’t know where the characters will take them until they’ve arrived.
The other question you sometimes ask
yourself, when you’re reading a novel you’ve written, is the one that most
writers hate: ‘Where do you get your ideas from?’ And again, it’s often
difficult to answer. With Unsafe Acts,
I know that the seed was sown in a casual remark from a friend, Mike Lloyd-Wiggins,
who said one day ‘You ought to write about an offshore platform. There’s plenty
of stuff going on out there.’ (This was the same friend who also said, a few
years ago ‘You ought to write a story about a figurehead carver’. So thanks,
Mike.) But that’s just the seed. When you see the dense vegetation that’s grown
from it (I know, crap metaphor, but I’m lazy) you really do wonder where all
these people were hiding, what made them appear. Where did they get their
attitudes?
One other interesting thing about this book
(for me anyway) is that it’s a different Jack Carston from the one I first met
when I wrote Material Evidence. Of
course, I’m different now from the person I was then but I don’t think that means
we’ve followed the same path. He now seems so fed up with the hoops he has to
jump through to satisfy his superiors and tick the right administrative boxes (what
a field day these crap – and now mixed, too – metaphors are getting), that I really
wonder whether the next book will find him leaving the job altogether.
Anyway, forget the Jubilee (definitely) and
the London Olympics, the date for your diary is the day after Valentine’s Day.
Share |
Holymarymudderofjaysus, would you slow down, Kirton? You're making the rest of us look dead lazy.
ReplyDelete(BTW, Don't know why I channelled my inner Mother Superior there.)
Looking forward to it, fella.
Bless you, Michael my child. Remember, in the beginning was the word, then there was another one, and another one - and so it goes on. Which reminds me, how about a guest blog from you when (or before) Blood Tears comes out?
ReplyDeleteCongratulations on the release, Bill. And coo - offshore platforms and homophobia; now there's a combination you don't see every day. ;) It sounds rather intriguing...
ReplyDeleteThanks, Fiona. But sadly, the macho offshore culture sees gay as a term of abuse. It was also interesting (and appalling) to learn that the vast majority of those accused of assaulting a 'queer' opt for the 'he made advances to me' defence, and it's nearly always successful. We live in unenlightened times in many respects.
ReplyDeleteYes we do, although I hope this is one of the last bastions of the worst aspects of that particular culture... :(
ReplyDelete