I’m in that wonderful proofreading mode
again – the galleys for Brilliant Workplace Skills have just arrived so I can
stop trying to force myself to switch from thinking about writing to writing
and instead get on with doing something useful by trying to weed out any
remaining typos. So this is an attempt to keep you visiting while I get on with
that. And it was triggered by thinking about doing some more interviews and
inviting some more guests.
There are lots of blogs which conduct
excellent interviews with writers and others and it’s always interesting to
hear how they approach their work and the attitudes they have to the
profession. I’ve even held some here and will no doubt do more in the future.
But I want to propose something a little different because I think we perhaps
reveal more about ourselves, or maybe create a more telling impression of who
we are (or who we want to appear to be) when questions aren’t direct or
leading. That’s why I’m inviting you to respond to a questionnaire.
As you’ll see, the questions are … er …
unusual, but that’s intentional. Routine is deadly, so I like to use
provocation, invite the unexpected, connect things which don’t belong together.
Don’t worry, in order that you won’t feel inhibited, the first respondent will
be me. As I wrote the questions, I hadn’t thought of that. So my approach to
them will be the same as yours. The only difference is that, by posting this
I’m actually committing myself to completing the questionnaire while you can
slink away and find more interesting blogs to read.
But if you do join in, I’d prefer answers
to be relatively short – maybe not as repressively so as tweets, but short
enough to stay interesting. Also, if lots of people take up the offer, it would
make the comments section rather long, so I suggest you send your answers to me
via email (bill@bill-kirton.co.uk)
and I’ll post them in whatever combinations seem to make sense. If the response
is a deathly silence, I’ll know that no-one ever reads this or that those who
do have lots to hide.
But it’s not serious – the main object is
to banish predictability and have some fun, so …
THE QUESTIONNAIRE
- If such a choice were possible and meaningful, would you prefer
to live in a real or a virtual world? Why?
A:
- You have permission to paint a celebrity in a colour of your
choosing. That doesn’t mean you make a portrait, you actually get to cover
them in paint. Tell us which celebrity, what colour, and why?
A:
- What do you think of the word ‘nice’? In what contexts would
you use it?
A:
- You have the chance to spend an evening with a film star of your
choice. Whom would you choose and what do you hope the evening would
bring? (Be honest.)
A:
- Complete the following sentence – ‘If I won the lottery and
discovered that the prize had to be shared with 3 million other winners, I
would …’
A:
- If you had to change nationality, which would you choose and
why?
A:
- Nominate 3 types of people for a long custodial sentence in a
prison that uses painful experimental therapies to ‘cure’ its inmates.
(NOTE. Obvious categories, such as bigots, tyrants, traffic wardens,
estate agents, bankers, politicians and family and friends of Rupert
Murdoch do not count.)
A:
- Your fairy godmother grants you a wish. You can curl up in
front of the fire with your favourite object. What is it? (NOTE. You can
define ‘object’ in any way you like.)
A:
- A beggar sitting on a blanket on the pavement (OK, sidewalk, if
you insist), says as you pass, ‘Fortune has favoured you but looks less
kindly on deprived and desperate beings such as myself. It would be a
kindness if you were to redistribute some of your wealth to redress the
balance between you and I’. What do you reply?
A:
- Would you like to be immortal? Why or why not?
A:
- What music would you play through loudspeakers at night outside
the house of someone you disliked intensely?
A:
I look forward to:
a) some interesting answers and
revelations, or
b) tumbleweed and the sound of the desert
wind.
Share |
Oky - interesting questions - only you have to give a couple of days to get back to you. a)it's gonna take me that long to consider my answers and write them in an email b)my mothers due any minute and I shouldn't even be reading your blog right now. Until later then...
ReplyDeleteNo rush, Janice. I've had a couple of interesting responses already. One of them (from Michael, naturally), suggests this 'should keep me going in posts for a wee while' - and I see what he means. I look forward to your answers to my stupid questions.
ReplyDeleteGood questions. I like the answers you've posted already. I'll take some time and give it a go, too.
ReplyDeleteMight even find out some things about me that after my 50+ years, I hadn't yet discovered.
Cheers!
You're right, Melanie, writing has a sneaky way of revealing things about yourself you maybe weren't aware of. I look forward to your answers - and any others still to come.
ReplyDeleteAnswers are on the way. Some of the questions were thought-provoking and others jibberish. (How's that for a Bill-like word?) :)
ReplyDeleteThanks, Linda. By jibberish, I take it you mean obfuscatory remarks whose obtuseness occludes rather than clarifies meaning. If so, you're dead right.
ReplyDelete